polemotheos
User
Platinum Boarder
| Posts: 530 |  |
|
the FINAL proof is near - 2006/03/10 18:53
PROP I; <b>The composition and geometry and arrangement of parts of objects intelligently designed do not form from insensate phenomena.</b>
Proof; This proposition is the grouping of two logical tautologies.
Tautology I; The composition and geometry and arrangement of parts of an object are none other than the essense of an object.
No two objects share the same essense unless they are the same sort of object.
Tautology II; Intelligently designed objects do not form from insensate phenomena.
Note; For example; a simple NOT complex; stop sign. The composition of a stop sign is usually some carbon steel with red and white paint. The geometry is a particularly thin sheet of uniform thickness in a perfect octagon.
Ask yourself this straightforward question; Can a stop sign form from insensate phenomena? For example; are there any volcanoes spewing out 2000 plus fereheight carbon steel in perfect geometries of thin sheet octagons? If so, is there any process that can place petro-chemical paints in unsmeared perfect shapes onto one of the objects sides?
The answer is no, it cannot form from any insensate phenomena we know of. Some nihilistic sophists would argue; it can form from insensate phenomena we have no knowledge of because we do not have absolute knowledge of all things. Pragmatically speaking, this level of criticism makes all beliefs unprovable assumptions because any belief can be countered from the ignorance of possibilities imagined. No matter how unrealistic. That sort of ignorance belongs to the idiocy hall of fame. Stop signs do not and never will form from insensate phenomena. It is as simple as that.
I have proven by necessity that something is intelligently designed if it's composition and geometry and arrangement of parts do not form from insensate phenomena; a posteriori and without appealing to observation of the designer/designing.
PROP II; <b>Living organisms have the attributes of intelligently designed objects.</b>
Proof; Living organisms share common genetic instance morphology and inheritence in proportion to there shared mechanisms, function, and utility.
Intelligently designed programming languages have instance morphology and inheretence. Engineering practice utilizes methods or circuits in various ways but in different implimentations or embodiments to accomplish similar tasks.
Note; These empirical observations are often abused as support for macroevolution. But NO theory of macroevolution assessed through mathematical or computational biology has been substantiated.
"while natural selection may be responsible for microchange-a trend in variations-no one can say indisputably that it is responsible for macrochange-the open-ended creation of an unexpected novel form and progress toward increasing complexity." - Kevin Kelly., Out of Control: The New Biology of Machines
http://www.kk.org/outofcontrol/contents.php
PROP III; <b>Abiogenesis is a phenomena of intelligent design.</b>
Proof; All things are made of something and it is a fact that living organisms are made up of non-living matter or basic chemicals. Any claim of abiogenesis not being true is none other than the position of ex nihilo, which I fully detest.
Intelligent beings specifically humans, have developed abiogenic components in their labs. It is highly probable human developed abiogenesis in labs will one day be able to develop living organisms.
However, nowhere in the entire world is there any insensate abiogenesis known to occurr. This world is very environmentally diverse. Yet in all the diversity of environments there is not a single example of abiogenesis happening as an insensate process.
Note; Many claim that the mechanism of abiogenesis is insensate, that is it has no consciousness producing the development. Intrestingly enough this from those who demonstrate intelligently directed abiogenesis. It is infact impossible to demonstrate abiogenesis as an insensate phenomena inside a lab. Besides, such a claim is an unfounded philosophical position having nothing to do with verifiable empirical science.
PROP IV; <b>Consciousness itself can effect material processes without materialistic mechanisms.</b>
Proof; Princeton University has developed and patented a device called a Random Generator that can measure conscious intentions directed at it. It can also measure the general field of a specific group of people if in the vacinity. Intrestingly, the device can also measure the overall global consciousness as it changes over time.
http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/correlations.pdf
http://noosphere.princeton.edu
Corollary; It follows that a being of consciousness of no materialistic mechanism can effect material processes including abiogenesis (PROP III).
PROP V; <b>Living organisms are the product of concsious creation.</b>
Proof: Abiogenesis is a phenomena of intelligent design (PROP III). Living organisms have the attributes of design (PROP II). There is no known insensate phenomena that can produce life or any of it's attributes (PROP III Note; PROP II Note; ). Therefore from (PROP I) living organisms are necessarily intelligently designed. Conscious materialistic mechanisms are not eternal. Therefore from (PROP IV Corollary) consciousness of no materialistic mechanism is the source of the creation of living organisms.
Post edited by: polemotheos, at: 2006/03/11 12:46
Post edited by: polemotheos, at: 2006/03/15 05:50
Your Peace, Surrender, In You,
YHVH Re-connect Co-operative |
Forum 
